How can we be more efficient? What’s holding us back from delivering great customer value, sooner?
These are pivotal questions shared by all success-driven product managers.
Productivity rises with the improvement of team engagement and working practices.
The greatest leverage in increasing productivity though is focusing on avoiding delays. Eliminating the causes that block our work and accumulate waiting time is the best way of getting more done, with less effort.
Any reduction of inactive time will improve your overall cycle time. Looking at wait time is usually the easiest and cheapest area to investigate first when it comes to process improvement.
When trying to trim down on your waiting times, one of the key metrics in Kanban can be of great help – flow efficiency.
The higher your flow efficiency is, the faster and smoother tasks flow through your process.
What is Flow Efficiency?
Essentially, flow efficiency is the ratio between your active time and total time.
It tells us how much work in progress is actually in progress.
To calculate your flow efficiency percentage, simply divide the time you actively spend working with your total cycle time and multiply the result with a hundred.
Let’s suppose your team needed 10 days to deliver a feature, but has only spent two days working on it. The flow efficiency of that feature would be 20%.
2/10 x 100% = 20%
Not an ideal percentage, but far from bad. Keep in mind it’s not uncommon for teams that are new to workflow management to start with an efficiency in the 15% range.
But in a highly-saturated market where quick turnaround is imperative, mature teams are able to reach 40% efficiency of their flow.
This is considered an optimal target due to the unpredictable nature of knowledge work. (2)
Teams with a flow efficiency in this range have the competitive edge to deliver quickly and consistently.
Analyzing the Efficiency of Your Flow
Avoiding the causes behind delayed tasks is the key to a higher flow efficiency.
But before you start searching for those bottlenecks, you need to be able to measure your flow efficiency at first place.
Let’s explore how you can design your Kanban board to do this.
Seeing the Clear Picture of Your Process
Whichever project management tool you’re using, make sure you divide the states in your workflow where tasks are being worked on and held up waiting.
This will give you a more realistic overview of your process as you’ll be able to:
- Uncover bottlenecks more easily. By defining queue (waiting) states, you’ll see where tasks spend time waiting.
- Put a finger on your efficiency. With queue states clearly visible, you can track how much time you actually spend working.
- See things as they are. A task shouldn’t stay in a work-in-progress column unless it’s being actively worked on.
The image below gives you an example of a Kanban pull system where the workflow is split into active and queue states. Columns where tasks are being worked on (Development and Testing) are active states while columns where work waits to be pulled are labeled queue states (Done).
Once you have your queue states designed, and your work starts flowing through, you can analyze the efficiency of your flow. Several tools can help you measure the impact of waiting time.
One of them is the Cumulative Flow Diagram, which can be very helpful in revealing bottlenecks. An expanding band that represents a queue state signals there are too many tasks held up waiting, meaning your team is likely struggling with the demand.
To resolve this bottleneck, you could try allocating more people to work on the tasks in it or reduce the amount of work entering it.
Similarly, you can analyze at a glance how much time a specific task has spent in each one of your queue states with the Cycle Time Scatterplot. Watch out for tasks with longer cycle times, high up the plot. These are usually the best candidates for a closer examination.
You can use the Flow Efficiency Chart to track the flow efficiency of your work items as well as your average flow efficiency. Once you’ve identified the tasks with the longest waiting times, think about the reasons behind their delays. The higher your flow efficiency is, the faster and smoother tasks flow through your process. You can also assess how your efficiency trends changed over time to evaluate your improvement efforts.
By looking beyond the time your work spends waiting, you would be able to expose the factors dragging your productivity down right away.
Try Nave’s range of data analytics for free on your favorite platform.
How to Amplify Your Flow Efficiency?
While trying to improve their flow efficiency, many companies simply start working on more commitments, hoping it will bolster their production rate.
This, however, is a misconception as more work in progress (WIP) inevitably means more multi-tasking and queuing. Along with an imbalance between demand and throughput, this is in fact one of the most common causes behind high waiting times.
Improving flow efficiency starts with visualizing your wait. Once you’ve identified the tasks with the longest waiting times, think about the reasons behind their delays. Often, you’ll stumble upon a bottleneck along the way.
When you’ve discovered the areas where waiting times could be reduced, you can start designing experiments to cut them down and improve flow efficiency.
Related posts
5 Comments
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Meet the Author

Sonya Siderova is a passionate product manager and a driving force behind Nave, a Kanban analytics suite that helps teams improve their delivery speed through data-driven decision making. When she's not catering to her two little ones, you might find Sonya absorbed in a good heavyweight boxing match or behind a screen crafting a new blog post.
Question: When measuring flow efficiency, the FE % on my Nave dashboard does not match the % on the FE chart, until after I go into the FE chart and then back to my Nave dashboard. When I close out of Nave and go back into it, I have to repeat the above. Can you explain why that is? It is my assumption that the FE chart % # is the accurate one, not the one that initial appears on my Nave dashboard. Thank you!
Dear Gretchen,
The FE % on the home page and the FE chart are influenced on the filters selection.
Would you please confirm you have the same filters on both pages? For example, on the FE chart you may have your To Do status selected where as that status is not available on the home page.
Please send us all the details at hello@getnave.com. My team will look into your data and explain where the difference come from
Best,
Sonya
Hi Sonya, thanks for the article!
When you mentioned to calculate flow efficiency percentage, simply divide the time you actively spend working with your total cycle time and multiply the result with a hundred. The result is related to a single task, right?
How to calculate for a specific range of time considering total tasks during this period?
Example: calculate flow efficiency from last two months total tasks.
Joao,
Regarding the selected period, you only want to include the tasks completed in that period.
From then on, sum up the active time of all tasks and divide it by the sum of their total cycle time. Then multiply the result by a hundred.
Hope this helps 😊
Thanks for your reply Sonya!